The Oak Bay News has recently been full of letters both against new houses and for new houses.
I want to look at a few of the houses they are complaining about:
2277 Central Ave
The old house at 2277 Central Ave on the left |
Design of the new house |
The house was for sale for $599,000 earlier this year and obviously sold as it the old house is gone and a new one is going up in its place
pic from Oak Bay Watch website |
The height of the new house is no higher than the previous house and might actually be lower. I do not have the measurements of the new house, but looking at the picture of it under construction, it is not going to be any larger than the old house was.
Overview of 2277 Central Ave |
The property had no significant trees on it that I can see.
This house does not push any of the limits, all it is doing is replacing an old post war bland cookie cutter house (the sort that Malvina Reynolds referred to her song Little Boxes) with something interesting and new. I see no reason anyone could oppose this house other than they do not like the look which I have trouble understanding because the previous house was ugly.
1058 Monterey Ave
This house was on the market for $685,000. It is a 9000 square foot lot and had a 1987 square foot house on it. The house 1987 square feet of house is a bit misleading because the house also has a basement of around 1300 square feet meaning it really is a 3300 square foot house. The house was built in 1912 and was getting a bit tired, it needed some renovation work. There seems to be a one car garage at the back of the lot on the lane.
A new house is being built on this lot but Method Built that they are calling Oak Lanes. The house seems like it will be between 3500 and 3800 square feet and a separate studio/garage at the back of the property.
I think this is very cool design |
Since early May neighbours have been complaining about the new house that is being built. Somehow the neighbours think they have a right to decide what someone else's house looks like. The new house is well within what is allowed on such a large lot and obviously fits within all the set backs and height restrictions. There is nothing here to compain about other than the look. The Oak Bay News nicely pointed this out in an editorial.
Among other things, Oak Bay Watch is complaining about the loss of trees. Three trees that seem to have been 40 or so years old were removed. The trees were located between the two houses where there is only a ten foot space for the trees. Two of the trees were going to a clear problem for both houses in the future and were going to have to come down.
Overview of 1059 Monterey Ave |
The neighbour to the south has a 700 to 750 square foot separate building at the back of the lot that is about the same size as the studio/garage at 1058 Monterey so the extra building at the back can not be an issue.
The design of the new house seems to be doing something innovative with the landscaping, they are getting away from having a lawn, something that most people should be doing since lawns are mono cultures that suck up water.
Oak Bay Watch is the worst of NIMBYism that I have seen in this City for some time. If they really do not want people to build new houses maybe they should go out and buy the properties. If they do not want to spend the money to buy the properties, it is none of their business what people do on their land if they are within the already very restrictive by-laws of Oak Bay.
5 comments:
You haven't had one of these huge houses go up next door to you. The bylaws were changed in 2007 to enable much larger houses to be built on small lots. This was actually an unintended consequence of changes intended to deal with other issues. I agree thast their website seems a bit off-message, but if you had looked in to what they presented to the OB Council on June 11 you'd have a more accurate picture of what the issues are. As it is, your sneering at what you call "Oak Bay NIMBY's" is off-base.
The change in the FSR in Oak Bay was minor and the new houses are in no case than I can find dramatically larger than what was there before.
In the case of 1059 Monetery, this is a very large lot at 9000 sq feet with street/lane frontage on three sides. The size of the house is very appropriate for the lot.
I look at the other pictures of the houses in question and I do not see a single monster house.
They reference a house on the 800 block of Transit - the scope and scale of that house is in keeping with rest of them.
What are some examples of monster houses? Give me some addresses.
The first house looks nice, I agree. However, this boxy look is becoming pretty common now. James Bay is filling up with these. See the new development on the south side of Christmas Hill for a whole street of these...
To me, the second one looks like some sort of small office / professional building.
I think it's great that communities stick together and have a vision but there isn't much to argue if the building fits within Oak Bay's own guidelines and code. Oak Bay is strict and that's why it's quite a beautiful place I don't think this house or the other will destroy that. I can understand some frustration as I prefer a more yard to house ratio but the truth is most people don't have time for all the upkeep anymore. It's easy enough if you're retired but that's just not the case for new buyers in the area.
Is picketing really the kind of community they want to put forward? I'd be happy I'm not getting a "Langford Special" contractor designed house next door.
Why not provide an aerial view of 1058 Monterey showing the footprint of the new house? Is it because the new house clearly has a footprint of more than double the previous structure's?
Post a Comment