Victoria has 52 bus routes with average weekday boardings of 94,585 of which 37,569 are on routes going to UVic. UVic routes are 23.08% of the routes but 39.72% of the boardings
Most boardings per day, top 25 routes - UVic routes in blue:
Route weekday boardings
- 6 10969
- 14 8993
- 27/28 8337
- 30/31 7223
- 50 6883
- 11 6519
- 4 6465
- 26 4627
- 7 3338
- 72 2661
- 15 2483
- 21 2229
- 22 2052
- 61 1954
- 39 1892
- 2 1817
- 16 1741
- 70 1726
- 75 1675
- 3 1613
- 8 1494
- 25 1098
- 24 897
- 10 798
- 52 705
UVic routes represent almost half of the top 17 busiest routes in the city.
Based on boardings per revenue hour - UVic routes in blue:
- 19 74.2
- 26 70.1
- 4 69.0
- 29 67.5
- 18 67.4
- 76 65.3
- 6 64.6
- 16 61.9
- 17 61.7
- 27/28 61.5
- 51 59.0
- 12 58.3
- 15 57.6
- 30/31 55.1
- 7 54.7
- 50 54.6
- 33 54.5
- 14 52.5
- 11 52.4
- 21 46.7
- 39 45.9
- 8 42.4
- 2 41.5
- 3 39.1
- 22 37.0
You can see from this second table that 11 of 12 UVic routes are on it and they are 11 of the top 19. #17, #18, and #19 in the top ten are routes that run only once or twice a day to serve schools.
All of the UVic routes achieve an average of over 50 boardings per revenue hour.
There are 20 routes that can not manage 200 boardings per weekday, 7 of them only run a limited number of times per day so they do achieve a reasonable amount of boardings per revenue hour, but the other 13 should really be considered for scrapping. The #86 is clearly not working
- 86 5 - 3.9 per hour
- 63 19 - 8.6 per hour
- 49 21 - 15.0 per hour
- 18 29 - 67.4 per hour
- 17 33 - 61.7 per hour
- 29 56 - 67.5 per hour
- 19 69 - 74.3 per hour
- 64 71 - 7.2 per hour
- 85 73 - 18.4 per hour
- 55 81 - 11.9 per hour
- 76 98 - 65.3 per hour
- 54 116 - 12.3 per hour
- 13 119 - 30.7 per hour
- 53 132 - 13.6 per hour
- 58 138 - 19.9 per hour
- 88 147 - 16.6 per hour
- 1 165 - 20.5 per hour
- 33 170 - 54.5 per hour
- 59 192 - 19.4 per hour
- 56 198 - 14.7 per hour
From the 13 underpreforming routes there would seem to be more than enough fat to cut to provide better service for UVic.
4 comments:
Very interesting data. As a regular #53 rider, I would obviously not want that route to be cut despite its under performance. I think more people would take some of these under performing routes if transit timed the connections better. I know I often can't make the #53 because my connection (#39) is perpetually late coming from VITP due to heavy congestion on interurban.
Interesting post, I, and 3-4 of my colleagues take the 85 in the morning from downtown to industrial Sidney, some of those community buses need to run, but connection timings, especially to longer distance routes is key, and as long as transit shares the road with car traffic, making connections work consistently in rush conditions is hard.
Thanks for doing this useful and informative post. I take the 85, along with a number of people who work in industrial Sidney and ride the 70 in from parts South. These buses are especially great in the winter, and without the 85 connecting to my 70, I would ride the bus a lot less. Cutting community buses to boost the main buses is not practical, they are different buses, different drivers, and in many situations, help seniors maintain mobility and avoid driving. These are benefits that are not often monetizable.
The #85 is doing not bad for a community bus
Post a Comment