I went to the open house today at the Ambrosia Event Centre that BC Transit was hosting about rapid transit.
The first thing I saw was the butt ugly pseudo streetcar parked outside on Fisgard. I am not convinced that it has many advantages over a conventional banana bus, but I was assured by a consultant that it did. The cost to Las Vegas for these was $1.3 million.
Inside they showed their planned route, still the westshore as a priority which I think is a huge mistake because this is not where the traffic is. I am not surprised that UVic to downtown was not chosen by the mayors as the first priority since the 20,000 students at UVic are not civic voters and therefore are off of the radar of the mayors. If rationallity had prevailed, rapid transit would be considered first and foremost for downtown to UVic, but in this issue rationality does not play well as I quickly heard inside.
The public in the region seems to be completely sold on rail as the solution even though we do not have the traffic to warrant it, it is more than twice as expensive to build and operate, and is less flexible. One gentleman walked around asked people which they preferred, rail or bus, I was the only one that answered bus.
I said bus because I know we do not have the potential for enough passengers to make rail work in this region. For rail to be financially viable, by which I mean a better option than buses, it has to be a route that will see 60,000 to 100,000 passenger trips per day. There are simply way too many example in the US of local transit systems harmed because the operational costs of rail sucked the resources out of the rest of the system.
The people from BC Transit there, the consultants and staff, seem to be well informed about the realities of Greater Victoria and which options fit with the needs of the people here. These people are professionals and know about the costs and are aware that it is simply unaffordable for the public in this region to build a rail line. The fact they brought in one of the ugly bus - trams seems to indicate they are now ready to show people that bus rapid transit is the option for this region.
People seem to be unaware of how few people there are on the Westshore in general and how few of them actually travel into the core each day. People also seem to be unaware of well funded our transit system here in Victoria is by the provincial government and how low our fares are. We use our transit in the core, it would be a shame to gut that for an unviable rail option. We could be paying a lot more in property taxes for our system if we go in the direction of rapid transit that is expensive.
Bus rapid transit could be phased in quickly and could allow for a lot of flexibility, the same buses could leave the rapid transit route and still operate as a regular bus.
4 comments:
Thanks for your point of view of a solution. I am going to the Open House in Langford today to voice my opinion on the plan and will see this bus-trams. I think that, eventually, we will have a LRT line- the time is now to start construction on it since the price will never go down. I like driving,and cycling and would like to see more people off the roads...
Regarding rail vs. buses, it is a tough call. In the short term, buses will be more affordable. But if we are to change the habits of people in the long term, we need solutions like rail. Communities need to built around rail terminals. But if you never build the rail system, how do we start to build that critical mass? I choose not to take the bus myself, because it is slow, not on time, there are too many stops, it's a rough ride, etc. I've lived in cities with rail, and I just prefer using those dedicated modes of transportation. Maybe in the downtown core, rail will not be faster than bus, but if we are to connect the suburbs in an effective manner, we need rail.
"...butt ugly pseudo streetcar..."
Pretty sure I saw this thing or something similar in Total Recall... or maybe Logan's Run, I forget. ;)
A lot of assumptions in this blogpost.
I, for one, is sure that the city will embrace it's rail, just like we did in our city (Bergen, got light rail a few months ago), and I'm sure that there will be enough passenger for the rail to further expand and be a success. If done well, it will be a huge hit not just financially, but the happiness will also go up, and the infrastructure will be a lot more streamlined. City planning will also be a lot easier.
If you are to compare to different cities in different countries, you may as well compare to Norway, where it is a huge success in smaller towns than Victoria. The dangers, however, with comparing to the US and Europe, is the one of comparing potato and apples - it's just not the same situations.
That they should focus on light rail different places than to the west shore, is something I can agree with though. I'm not a fan of the westshore link at all - but if that is what they decide, it's a lot better than nothing, and it makes further expansion cheap.
Post a Comment