Friday, September 30, 2011

2011 - The Year of the Mayors

I should have seen this coming but I missed it.   The 2011 election in this region will be an election about who the mayor is.

As the incumbent are not running, we will see new mayors in:

  • Oak Bay
  • Central Saanich
  • Colwood
  • Sooke

We have competitive races for mayor in:

  • Saanich
  • Victoria
  • View Royal

This is seven of the 13 municipalities in this region representing more than 250,000 of the people in the region.  We could still see races in North Saanich, Methosin and Highlands.    I do not expect to see competitive races in Langford, Esquimalt or Sidney.

In 2008 we only had six competitive races and a couple more that had a bit of action but were never in question as to the results.  Six new mayors were elected, three from vacancies and three because incumbents were defeated.

There is a potential for the senior political leadership in this region to dramatically change this year.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Saanich Council Race

As of this point I am only certain of seven eight people running for Saanich council:

  • Susan Brice - incumbent
  • Judy Brownoff - incumbent
  • Paul Gerrard - incumbent
  • Dean Murdock - incumbent
  • Vicki Sanders - incumbent
  • Nicola Wade
  • Lief Wergeland - incumbent
  • Rob Wickson

I am fairly certain that Vic Derman is running again.   I do not know what Wayne Hunter's plans are.

We are realistically looking at eight or nine serious candidates for Saanich council this fall.   If Wayne Hunter does not run, I really do not see any chance of a competitive race in Saanich this time around.

In 2005 there were 17 candidates of which I would say 11 were serious and four more really tried.  2002 was similar with 16 candidates and 12 serious contenders.

In 2008 there were only 11 candidates of which 10 were serious.

In 2011 it looks like there are only going to be eight or nine serious candidates.   Something is wrong when there are fewer and fewer people really trying to get elected to council.   It is bad for local governance, it is bad for public engagement.   If it were not for a strong race happening for the Mayor's chair, there would be no real reason for people to turn out and vote in Saanich this election.

2005 Saanich Election

These are the 2005 Saanich municipal election results

Frank Leonard was acclaimed as mayor

Council - 8 to elected
  1. Susan Brice      8,597
  2. Vic Derman       8,474 (+390) (inc)
  3. Leif Wergeland   8,399 (+306) (inc)
  4. Judy Brownoff    8,376 (-382) (inc)
  5. Bob Gillespie    7,656  (+30) (inc)
  6. Jackie Ngai      7,483 (-485) (inc)
  7. Wayne Hunter     6,929
  8. Vicki Sanders    6,805
  9. Ian Graeme       6,444
  10. Paul Gerrard     5,646
  11. Paul McKivett    5,267
  12. Evan Roberts     3,858
  13. Alastair Murdoch 3,801
  14. Lana Popham      3,696
  15. Patrick Chenier  3,202
  16. Ralph Sketchley  2,369
  17. Katrina Jean Herriot 1,204 -Work Less Party
Numbers in brackets are change from the 2002 results

Other Saanich Election Results
2011 2008 2005 2002 1999 1996 1993 1990

Thursday, September 22, 2011

My offer to anyone running in the municipal elections

I like to see people take part in the democratic process in anyway they would like.   The process of democracy is more important to me than any political view points people may hold.  So, here is my offers to all you candidates and potential candidates out there:


  • I am more than happy to post any press release you issue on this blog - email it to me 
  • I am happy to sit down with you over coffee or lunch and hear about why you are running and post my thoughts here
  • I am also happy to talk with anyone wanting to know more what it takes to run for office and what works well and what is not likely to work well to get elected.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

LRT Debate October 6th

The UDI is hosting a debate between Rob Wickson and Bev Highton on the LRT.

This is the proposed agenda for the lunch:

LRT FORUM FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
DRAFT - Lunch Event Schedule

Date: Thursday, October 6, 2011
Time: 11:30am to 1:45pm
Place: Harbour Towers – 345 Quebec Street

11:30am –
Registration and name tags
Mingle – collateral browse

11:45pm –
Welcome by Mike Miller (UDI President)
Lunch is served

12:15pm –
Introductions
– moderator (Stephen Andrew) (5 min)
Pro – LRT speaker Rob Wickson (25 min) Share views of having LRT link to West Shore
Against LRT speaker – Bev Highton (25 min) Share their concerns for LRT

1:10pm –
Question and Answer – facilitated by moderator (Stephen Andrew)

1:45pm –
Closing remarks and thank you’s

Monday, September 19, 2011

An Idea for Vancouver Island and Saltspring Island

Both Vancouver Island and Saltspring should join the International Island Games Association.

The Island Games are a bi-annual multi-sport event that takes place on islands around the world that are not countries on their own right.   The Isle of Wight hosted them this year.    The best analogy to the Island Games are the Commonwealth games

What I like about the games is that they are not nearly as serious as the 'big' games.   I also like how they games give a degree of recognition to the various islands that really do have their own cultures.

If not Vancouver Island, I could see Saltspring, or the Gulf Islands as a whole, joining.  
Current members are:

  • Åland Islands
  • Alderney
  • Ynys Môn
  • Bermuda
  • Cayman Islands
  • Falkland Islands
  • Faroe Islands
  • Frøya
  • Gibraltar
  • Gotland
  • Greenland
  • Guernsey
  • Hitra
  • Isle of Man
  • Isle of Wight
  • Jersey
  • Minorca
  • Orkney
  • Rhodes
  • Saaremaa
  • Saint Helena
  • Sark
  • Shetland
  • Western Isles

A whole bunch of very interesting places to visit, I think it would be a very interesting connection to make for us on this coast.    Vancouver Island is the largest population in North America that has to be accessed by a ferry, we really are the biggest island going.

Frankly, some of the members have rather small populations so it would not be out of the question for Haida Gwaii to join.  

PEI was a member but pulled out this year.   Maybe if some BC islands were to join PEI would come back and maybe the island of Newfoundland.  The next games are in 2013 in Bermuda, so it is actually more convenient for teams from the Americas than something in Europe.

Imagine Saltspring hosting the Island Games at some point in the future.  I can see it as a hoot.

If I had the spare time in my life I would get things rolling, but according to my calendar, I get spare time next sometime in 2015 or later.

Friday, September 16, 2011

Brian Tucknott running to be COlwood Mayor

Tucknott announces no tax increases if elected Mayor of Colwood
Affordability and Accountability twin pillars of campaign

September 15, 2011

For immediate release, Victoria, BC

Colwood Councillor Brian Tucknott, a retired airline captain and union leader today announced that he is running for Mayor of Colwood with a pledge of no further municipally generated tax increases if elected.

Colwood is a community of working families and retired people that have been hit hard with over 30% in municipal tax increases in the last three years. The result has been seniors, the unemployed and those on fixed incomes struggling to make ends meet and families both renters and homeowners facing increased housing costs.

“Given the misplaced priorities that have occurred in Colwood, I have consistently voted against these tax increases but have found myself in the minority time after time. Colwood has ignored the financial turmoil facing the world and has acted as though it was immune, giving rise to claims from at least one accountant that Colwood is operationally bankrupt,” said Tucknott.

“It is my hope that as Mayor I will have a working majority of councillors who recognize that government has to live within the means of its taxpayers, many of whom have not seen any increase in their real income in years,” he added.

Tucknott, who prior to becoming an airline captain served as a British Bobby (police officer) also intends to bring much greater fiscal discipline and accountability to Colwood. “For far too many years economic development opportunities have passed our community by as our municipal government has been embroiled in lawsuits and crises of its own making. It is time to bring in a new era of affordability and accountability to Colwood,” declared Tucknott.

”I want a community where seniors and young families can afford to live and where our tax dollars go to providing infrastructure that enhances our community. I want every dollar of taxpayers` money to be properly accounted for so that voters know what it is being spent on and why,” he pledged.

“It is for that reason that I commend the provincial government for wanting to provide an Auditor General for municipal governments through B.C. I have little doubt that an Auditor General would have much to say about what has happened in Colwood,” noted Tucknott.

”A sustainable community cannot just be a green one that caters only to a select few. It must also serve the needs of working families and those seeking employment. We need to make genuine affordable housing a key component of our community and we need to encourage businesses that will broaden our tax base and provide employment opportunities,” he said.

“As Mayor I will represent the entire community not just special interest groups. Every resident deserves equal representation not just those with certain political affiliations or connections. It is for this reason that I ask all residents of Colwood for their vote on November 19th,” Tucknott concluded.

For further information contact Brian Tucknott at (250) 474-8180 or email him at tucknott4mayor@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @tucknott4mayor

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Tim Morrison for Esquimalt Council Press Release

TIM MORRISON FOR ESQUIMALT CAMPAIGN
NEWS RELEASE
September 14, 2011
For immediate release

Esquimalt Blogger Seeks Council Seat
- In the era of social media, an Esquimalt blogger is progressing from keyboard to candidate.

EsquimaltReview.com blogger Tim Morrison announced today in a blog post that he will be seeking an Esquimalt Council seat in this fall’s municipal elections.

“In the era of social media, it is increasingly common that more community activism is taking place on computers,” says Morrison. “It is now a natural progression to go from keyboard to candidate.”

Morrison, who serves as Co-Chair of the Esquimalt Resident Association, said he plans to run a grassroots campaign through social media channels.

“My blog and facebook account have long been about issues and life in Esquimalt and, today, I launched a twitter account (@TimForEsquimalt) as yet another channel to get people in Esquimalt better connected and informed,” says Morrison.

In addition to serving as Esquimalt Residents Association Co-Chair for the past two years, Morrison is also a member of the Esquimalt Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee, Esquimalt Chamber of Commerce, and a Block Captain for Esquimalt Block Watch.

“It is time to renew Esquimalt Council with new voices and new ideas,” says Morrison. “We need councillors to lead our community and we need councillors that will listen to our community.”

“We need to focus on what should be down and what should be up in Esquimalt,” adds Morrison. “We need to keep our property taxes down in order to make our community more affordable to younger families while upping economic opportunities for new businesses to locate here in support of our tax base.“

Tim Morrison is a communications professional with the BC Assessment Authority. He has also been a policy advisor, educator, school trustee, journalist, world traveller and adventure tour guide. Tim Morrison is volunteer editor/blogger for www.EsquimaltReview.com

For more information, visit Tim’s campaign website at www.TimMorrison.ca

-30-

Media contact: Tim Morrison, Tel. 250-893-8188 / Email: Tim2011@telus.net

Media Release from SD #61 Candidate David Brazter - Schools Not Prisons

MEDIA RELEASE

School Board Candidate Launches “Schools Not Prisons” Campaign
Date: September 15, 2011
For Immediate Release

Victoria, BC - Today, David Bratzer officially launched his campaign for school board trustee in District 61 (Greater Victoria). His campaign theme is “Schools Not Prisons.” It recognizes education as a
major factor in determining whether a young person ends up in jail.

David Bratzer has served Esquimalt and Victoria as a police officer for the past six years. In 2006, he graduated as class valedictorian and top academic student from the Police Academy at the Justice
Institute of BC. In 2008, he became one of the first officers in North America to call for an end to the failed War on Drugs. In 2009 and 2010, he testified against “tough on crime” bills in Ottawa before the
Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.

The campaign will highlight opportunities to improve public education for all students while reducing their risk of contact with the criminal justice system. For example, he is scheduled to make a brief
presentation at the next school board meeting regarding the district policy on substance abuse. The policy has not been updated for nineteen years and during this time enormous progress has been made in
the field of evidence-based drug education. This public meeting is scheduled for September 19th at 7:30pm in the Tolmie Board Room at 556 Boleskine Road.

“A school board benefits from diversity. I can bring a unique skill set and a fresh perspective to the board table,” stated David Bratzer, adding, “I would like to engage the entire community in building a safer and healthier school environment.”

He will be on leave during much of the campaign and his views do not represent those of his department. He is following in the footsteps of Derek Chow. Now retired, Mr. Chow served as a Saanich School District trustee for nine years during his policing career.

For more information:
David Bratzer
(250) 813-2117
www.bratzer.net

Matteus Clement (Campaign Manager)
(250) 885-5758

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Transit in this region

One of the reasons people keep telling me we need the LRT is because the existing bus system on Douglas is not able to deal with the volumes of traffic any longer, that the system has maxed out and is failing.

I am close enough to the Douglas corridor that I often am on it or pass over it.  I see little evidence that the buses are overloaded.   When I ride on the buses from downtown to my home I can not think of a time I have not been able to get a seat.  I have asked around of the people I know that use the #50, #60, #30/31 or the #70 and no one has been passed by because of a full bus.

So where does the system seem to be maxed out?   Getting people to and from UVic.   I heard a lot from my niece last year how often she would have a #26 pass her by because it is full.  I understand that on the #14 route from downtown to UVic there is often a morning problem with buses being full.

Looking at the sort of traffic demand for the buses, it seems to me the transit change this need is for some better express buses to UVic.   Something like the Vancouver B-Line buses, one to go from downtown to UVic via Fort and Richmond, the other to go Douglas and Mackenzie.    That would seem to solve the most urgent public transit needs in this region.

Juan de Fuca Lands - so now what?

The CRD land use committee has voted against the Three Point Properties application to rezone 583 acres of land to the west of Jordan River.   What happens now with these lands?

The land is in seven separate titles which would mean these properties could end up as seven large rural residential properties.  Effectively these are seven building lots, the actual size of the properties does not matter.   The value will always be limited because they will not have access to the water though likely have good ocean views.  

Another limitation no one has talked in the context of these properties is the access to electrical power.   The power line running along the West Coast Road is a small scale transmission line, I think, thought the transmission line officially ends at Jordan River (1L146).   If the line along the road is not designed for residential electrical distribution, to get power to the properties is going require stringing another wire on the poles from Jordan River.   This is five to ten kilometers of distribution line that needs to be installed.  

If you want power out there and it is not available, you will have to pay for it.   It is not going to be cheap.   I had a chance to buy an amazing 160 acre property in 1998 but it was 15 km from the nearest substation and needed to have a residential distribution line installed on existing poles.   The price quoted to get the line was more than the price of the property.

If there is no electrical power available to the properties, their value as individual lots drops dramatically. Honestly I see little danger of the lands being developed for any sort of housing without power.

If the land remains as forest with the intent to harvest, the land is likely to start to see harvesting in about 30 years.   583 acres of coastal western hemlock forest should provide something on the order of 110,000 cubic meters of mature timber.  This has a value in the ball park of $6,000,000 at current values of timber.  

There is no danger of immediate harvesting on the lands, but at some point there will be enough value on each of the properties that they will be worth buying, clearcutting and then selling.  $850,000 to $900,000 is a reasonable expectation of the value of the timber on average in each property when the timber is mature.

I expect that the properties will not have much happen with them any time soon.  At some point the properties will be sold and harvested.  Without being tied to a tree farm licence, the timber harvesting is not under the same rules as harvesting on public lands.   There much fewer restrictions on private land timber harvesting than harvesting within a Crown Land timber tenure.

My expectation is to see the properties clear cut from boundary line to boundary line in the late 30s or early 40s.

The quoted value of $5,000,000 to buy the property is too low, it does not even reach the current market values of mature timber on the land.   I suspect that a current fair market value for the property is something in the order of $8,000,000, though I have not done an extensive market analysis to confirm this, but $5,000,000 is clearly a low ball value.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

2002 Sidney Election Results

2002

Mayor
  1. Don Amos     1,716 incumbent
  2. Bob Currie     516
  3. James Campbell 411
Councillor - 6 to be elected
  1. Jeannette Hughes     1,872 (+684) incumbent
  2. Marilyn Loveless     1,793 (+468) incumbent
  3. Peter Wainright      1,693 (+481) incumbent
  4. Thomas D. (Tim) Chad 1,682 (+748) incumbent
  5. Colin Plint          1,665 (+297) incumbent
  6. Bob Jones            1,522 (+627) incumbent
  7. John McNally         1,329
  8. James Bechard        1,259

2005 Central Saanich Election Results

Office of the Mayor
  1. Jack MAR        2,099 sitting councilor
  2. Allison HABKIRK 1,768 (-1049)(inc)
Office of Councillors

  1. Alastair BRYSON 2,695
  2. Robert THOMPSON 2,564 (-32) (inc)
  3. Chris GRAHAM    2,358 (-445)(inc)
  4. Zeb KING        2,254 (-31) (inc)
  5. John GARRISON   2,157
  6. Susan MASON     2,053 (-277)(inc)
  7. Wayne WATKINS   1,971
  8. Sue STROUD      1,663
  9. Mike FAGAN      1,015
Numbers in brackets are change in vote from 2002 results

Monday, September 12, 2011

Sponsorship in Saanich Parks

There is an RFP out in Saanich for Partnership/Sponsorship of parks.   I have been thinking about this RFP and wondering what it might mean for the parks and form it might take.  It is also not making me feel warm and fuzzy about Saanich Parks.

This is the description of the RFP:
The Corporation of the District of Saanich is requesting proposals from experienced marketing, sales, or resource development professionals or firms for the development of a strategy and the sales of partnerships or sponsorships for the Saanich Department of Parks and Recreation.
The objective of this RFP is to determine and evaluate the potential for the successful development and implementation of a business and sales plan that will result in ongoing revenues for the District of Saanich, specifically through partnership and/or sponsorship agreements.

Partnership says to me a business doing business in the parks - I suspect that is not what is meant, but it is what I read out of it.

What I think we are talking about is private business sponsorship of parks through donations to council.   So what form would the recognition of the donation take?  Would there be re-naming of parks?

The RFP also mentions the various forms this could all take:

A few examples of the types of partnership opportunities available include (but not limited to):
  • Existing large indoor screen plasma advertising
  • Advertising in all of our published material including our Active Living Guide
  • Arena Board Advertising
  • Sponsorship of festivals and events
  • Banners & Mounted signage advertisements
  • Golf Course hole sponsorship and score card advertisements, signage and more
  • Logos on our access cards (annual passes), brochures, program posters and rack cards, lesson report cards.
  • Logo’s on facility windows and doors
  • Recognition and mentions on all department paid advertising
  • Recreation program sponsorship
  • Arts and Culture events and program sponsorship
  • Sponsorship of park facilities and parks programs
I can understand the interest in trying to find new sources of revenue, but would the revenues really be worth enough to have more commercialism in our city?

The debates about the Incorporation of the City of Victoria

150 years ago in the fall of 1861 the legislature of Vancouver Island was debating the Act to Incorporate the City of Victoria.   The debates are covered in detail in the British Colonist.

On Wednesday September 11th the debates centered around what powers Victoria should be allowed to have and if the City by-laws would have to all be approved by the Governor of Vancouver Island.   The debate reaches a point where the members seem to realize that they may be giving the City of Victoria a stronger law making power than the legislative council of Vancouver Island had.

The other issue at debate was what sort of powers the City of Victoria should be allowed to have.   There is talk about regulating weights and measures, the sale and storage of gunpowder, and the inspection of gasometers.   What they specifically do not want to give the City is any power to restrict private property or interests.  They wanted a narrow and specific set of subjects the City could pass by-laws about.

This makes my curious now, what is the standing of by-laws passed in the 1860s now?   The City seems to only have been able to pass by-laws in areas of jurisdiction that the City no longer is allowed to pass by-laws about.

Thursday, September 08, 2011

Uptown Centre - some pics of the construction from today


So what are these drains for that
just sort empty off the roof?


Nice trees now, but how will they fare in the long term?



2002 Saanich Election Results

In the 2002 Saanich election, of the 65,974 eligible voters in Saanich, 16,248 cast ballots for a 24.6% voter turnout. A total of 83,481 votes were cast for an average of 5.14 votes per elector.

Mayor
Frank Leonard elected by acclamation

Council - 8 to be elected
  1. Carol Pickup        9,318  (-517) (inc)
  2. David Cubberley     9,146  (+474) (inc)
  3. Judy Brownoff       8,758  (-927) (inc)
  4. Leif Wergeland      8,093 (-1268) (inc)
  5. Vic Derman          8,084  (+741) 
  6. Jackie Ngai         7,968 (-1042) (inc)
  7. Bob Gillespie       7,626 (-1679) (inc)
  8. Nichola Wade        7,546 (inc) - elected in a by-election
  9. John Garrison       6,384 (-1877) (inc)
  10. Joan Barton         5,642
  11. Dean Murdock        4,667 
  12. Jennifer Neely      4,422
  13. Gracie Macdonald    3,608
  14. Brad MacLaren       3,521
  15. Michael Butterfield 2,749
  16. Jim Frankin         1,659
Numbers in brackets are change from 1999 results

Past Saanich Election Results

1996 City of Victoria Election results

1996 City of Victoria  Total Votes Counted 13,357 - I have no idea why the turn out was so low

Mayor
  1. Bob CROSS     7,029 (+1405)(inc)
  2. Laura ACTON   5,566 - sitting councilor
  3. Ian HUNTER      424
  4. Kay LINES       205
  5. Paul TURGEON     64
  6. David SHEBIB     28
  7. Jonathon LEDREW  23
  8. G. David NIBLOCK 18
Council
  1. Helen HUGHES           6,690 (+2397)(inc)
  2. Geoff YOUNG            6,483 (+1167)(inc)
  3. Chris COLEMAN          4,623 (+1798)
  4. David McLEAN           4,605 (+1019)(inc)
  5. Pamela MADOFF          4,569 (+1267)(inc)
  6. Bea HOLLAND            4,205
  7. Bob FRIEDLAND VCE      3,918  (+656)(inc)
  8. Jane LUNT              3,662  (+538)(inc)
  9. Gene MILLER            3,146
  10. Sandra HUDSON          3,023
  11. Harinder DHILLON VCE   2,886
  12. Dave DAVIES            2,777
  13. Roz MELLANDER          2,623
  14. Art VAN DEN BERG Green 2,581 (elected in 1999 as a Green)
  15. Al BEATTIE VCE         1,953
  16. Jack McDONALD VCE      1,941
  17. Jackie KOROSCIL VCE    1,909
  18. Jack ETKIN Green       1,875
  19. Timothy Van ALSTINE    1,849
  20. Lane A SHERMAN VCE     1,687
  21. Bill McELROY           1,657
  22. Chuck BEYER VCE        1,613
  23. Rande Lee McMURRAY     1,503
  24. Paul HOLMES            1,363
  25. Cristobal YOUNG        1,189
  26. Victor ALLEN           1,047
  27. Mike BURNETT             932
  28. Syd HASKELL              873
  29. Walt NEUFELD             761
  30. Gary BEYER               747
  31. Richard FAHL             682
  32. Joe GILGUNN              398
  33. Robin H. BUOTE           337
  34. Denis F. OLIVER          233  (-58)
Numbers in brackets are change from 1993 results

Past Election Results

Wednesday, September 07, 2011

1999 City of Victoria Election Results

Since I know I have looked for these figures, I thought I would post them here for past elections around the region.   No guarantees when I will do this but here is the start

1999 Election  
Mayor 16241 votes
  • Alan Lowe         7080 - 43.59% sitting councilor
  • Bob Friedland VCE 5626 - 34.64% sitting councilor
  • Geoff Young       3076 - 18.94% sitting councilot
  • 11 others totalling 459 - 2.83%
All three candidates running were sitting councilors at one point though Alan Lowe had not been on the 1996-1999 council.

Council
16487 voters cast 94738 votes  – this is an average of 5.75 votes per voter
  1. Helen Hughes            7619 (+929)(inc)
  2. Pam Madoff              6441 (+1872)(inc)
  3. Rob Fleming (VCE)       5439 
  4. Denise Savoie (VCE)     5406 
  5. Bea Holland             5360 (+1155)(inc)
  6. David McLean            5161 (+556)(inc)
  7. Art Vanden Berg (Green) 5052 (+2571)
  8. Jane Lunt               4809 (+1147)(inc)
  9. Chris Coleman           4736 (+113)(inc)
  10. Wally Meyer zu Erpen    4619 (Green)
  11. Dean Fortin             4608 (managed to win in 2002)
  12. John Luton (VCE)        4600 (ran next in 2008 and was elected)
  13. Lenora Burke (Green)    4560
  14. Dave Davies             4288
  15. Robin Blencoe           3072 (NDP MLA Vic-Hillside from 1983 to 1996, councilor 1977-83)
  16. Roz Mellander           2054
  17. Joe Payne               1766
  18. Diana Lydia Smardon     1662
  19. Gregory Hartnell        1334
  20. Paul Holmes             1322 (-41)
  21. Riga Gordon             1131
  22. Laird Taylor            1048
  23. Ronald Eugene George    1008
  24. Ted Godwin               968
  25. Christian Hauer          908
  26. Jerry Jolly              849
  27. C Joe Richards           839
  28. Denis Oliver             387
  29. Aaron Duane Corzatt      377
  30. John Earle Stevenson     288
  31. Dave Ovans               252
  32. Michael T Sammon         194
Numbers in brackets are change from 1996 results

Past Election Results
2011 2008 2005 2002 1996 1993 1990

Tuesday, September 06, 2011

Letter to the Editor on the Municipal Auditor Idea by Paul Brown

Auditor would bring transparency to city hall
Published: August 31, 2011 6:00 AM
Re: Municipal auditor plans questioned by mayors (News, Aug. 26)


It is a shame Victoria Mayor Dean Fortin so quickly dismisses the call for a municipal auditor general. Where would we be today without the valuable work of Sheila Fraser, the former federal auditor general who uncovered the sponsorship scandal?


Fortin suggests the job would be political. How can he say such a thing? Auditors general do not play politics, they offer insights on how to improve things.


I suspect where there is smoke, there is fire. Consider the closed nature of Victoria’s city hall, where many council items are decided in-camera, where records of individual councillors’ votes are rarely kept, where information is often only revealed by FOI requests, and where hand-picked committees advise staff in private meetings.


Our city hall is dangerously close to being run by a group of politicians and bureaucrats whose interests appear to be better served by the closed-door style of government than the needs of the taxpaying public.


Openness and transparency are an asset. An open city hall should be welcomed by the council and the administration. We can all learn from each other.


Mr. Fortin, consider what Jack Layton wrote the day before he died: “Hope is better than fear.”


Paul Brown


Victoria

Chances to Meet and Greet Frank Leonard

Here are two chances to meet and greet Mayor Frank Leonard:

Thursday, September 8th
4pm – 6:00pm
Nando’s Chicken – 1600 Government St

Thursday, September 15th
11:45am – 1:00pm
Fireside Grill – 4509 W. Saanich Rd.

Apies and refreshments at both

Monday, September 05, 2011

Office Space in the region of Uptown

Right now the Uptown Centre is under construction and will add more office space to the "Uptown" area of Saanich.   So how much office space is there now in this area?

  • Uptown will have 200,000 square feet of class A office space
  • 3975 Carey Road - 35,000 square feet
  • 3300 Douglas Road - 18,300 square feet.
  • There is the former BC Assessment offices at 3350 Douglas Street with 75,000 square feet
  • There is the Saanich Municipal Hall - space for 150 employees - 50,000 square feet?
  • The SD 61 offices at the old Mount Tolmie School - about 25,000 square feet of space.
  • There is a new building going in at Audley and Douglas - 3351 Douglas Street.   There will be about 25,000 square feet of office space.
  • 3318 Oak Street - 16,000 square feet of office space
  • 830 Shamrock Street - about 28,000 square feet  - recently built
  • Short Street - 3000 square feet
  • 4000 Seymour Place - the building with the core IT services for the provincial government - about 280,000 square feet of office space.
  • Gateway Center - this offers more office space, about 20,000 square feet
  • Focus Building - 57 Cadillac - about 12,000 square feet
  • Other assorted office space on Cadillac - about 15,000 square
  • There are other small office spaces coming in at about 100,000 square feet

This brings us in at around 1,000,000 square feet of office space in this area.   More than a 1/4 of the space is new or under construction at the moment.   This means the Uptown area will be home to about 10% of the total office space in this region.

The problem in the Uptown area is that is more or less completely unwalkable.   The offices at 4000 Seymour Place are only 350 meters from Uptown Centre, but the walking distance is more than kilometer.   As the crow flies the building at 3975 Carey Road is only 250 meters from Uptown, but walking at it is closer to 500 meters.   Saanich Municipal Hall is 250 meters away in a straight line, but 700 meters if you walk.

Walking is not great, but when it comes to driving around, the area is not designed with any real street connectivity in mind.   Each building feels like it is disconnected for all the others around it.

There is a hope that the LRT will cause the area to have more development, but given the layout the walkablity of the area, I think that is not realistic.  

Thursday, September 01, 2011

The Three Primary Flawed Assumptions in the LRT Proposal

  1. That maximum bus capacity is 2000 people per hour - current capacity is higher and can be much higher
  2. That the travel time for Westshore to Humbolt St Downtown on the bus is 60 minutes - current travel time is 45-53 minutes, very few trips are at the longest time
  3. That the status quo requires investment of $250,000,000 - looking at what they have suggested for the status quo, there is no needed investment at all.

If we correct the reports to use the correct numbers, the evaluation of the options looks very, very different.

Full lifecycle costs adjusted for a business as usual using no initial capital costs
  • Business as Usual - $427,000,000
  • Bus Rapid Transit - $747,000,000
  • LRT $1,227,000,000
The LRT is argued to be better than business usual because of the multiple account evaluation.   When apply the corrected assumptions, those benefits go away.  Almost all of the benefits for BRT and LRT are from transportation benefits, in the case of the full LRT, $1,237,000,000.   Of this $792,000,000 is from time saved by drivers and less wear and tear on cars of people that choose to change to transit.   

The growth of ridership is based on the LRT being faster, which it really is not much faster at all.   If growth in transit use from the Westshore is only slightly increased due to the LRT, the $792,000,000 benefit quickly disappears.

The next largest area of benefit from the LRT is that there will be fewer accidents.   The data they used is based on US information, they did not use the BC Transit record for Victoria as a baseline.   My understanding is that we have a system that has very accidents and is actually pretty good.   The assumption is that the LRT would safe $425,000,000 through fewer accidents.

All in all, $1,217,000,000 of the benefit of the LRT flows to people driving private cars or operating vehicles for business.   All the other benefits are estimated to be $224,000,000.   The poor bastards that are transit users will only see a net benefit of $19,000,000.   

The value of the LRT benefit to car drivers is vastly overstated.   At best, I can not make the math get much past $500,000,000 and that assumes the local bus drivers are not actually better than American bus drivers.

The report assumes property value increases of $182,00,000.   They rely on a whole series of reports that come up with a vast array of results - I have read almost all the same reports and all I can say out of them is that there is a probable small increase in single family homes near a station, but there is little no evidence to show any benefit to commercial development.   Most of the reports look at systems that have a significant increase in traffic on a route.

The report assumes an increase in traffic because of flawed initial assumptions.  The Victoria LRT will not be able to carry more people that the buses currently can do at peak hours.  On this basis, it would only be prudent to assume there will be no measurable increase in commercial property values due to the LRT.   The residential increase is $64,000,000, I have no reason to doubt that number.

OK, so where are we at for LRT benefits?   At most $600,000,000 though much more likely to be $300,000,000 or less.   This is balanced with a full lifecycle cost of $1,227,000,000. 

LRT - New Data

So finally I get to read more data about the LRT proposal and I am even more stunned than before at how this report was written.

1) They assume buses have a capacity of 65 people, not 75 to 100 that our buses actually do.   84 is a good average number to assume for the status quo.  They use this 65 person number and a 2 minute maximum headway to assume that the limit of buses is 2000 people per hour.   They then use this limit as the basis for showing how good the LRT option is.   The reality is that the current maximum capacity per hour is already over 3000.   Furthermore, if we look at all the buses that use Douglas for part of their route downtown, our maximum capacity is 6800.

This means there is a clear flaw through out the work which leads to major benefits being ascribed to the LRT over buses.

This comes volume 4 page 32.

2) They assume that staring now, the bus network out to the Westshore will not be able to increase ridership because it is already at capacity.  As I already pointed out, the system is not at capacity and can increase service to a lot more than now.   It would seem to be reasonable that buses should be able to continue on a long term standard growth rate.   The report specifically under estimates possible bus use increase

This comes from volume 4 page 27

3) The report assumes that business as usual involves a major capital project - building more lanes on the TCH just for buses.   If we factor that out, the actual capital costs of business as usual is $40,000,000 or so over 30 years.

Page 40 volume 4

4) The cost of interest during construction for the LRT is estimated to be $95,000,000, or more than twice the cost of business as usual if you take away the highway expansion.

Page 41 volume 4

5) The following bus routes are specifically named as to be replaced by the LRT (this is from the report directly, the report has the wrong names):
4 - UVic/Downtown
21 - Interurban/Downtown
22 - Vic General/Mayfair
31 - Glanford
30 - Carey
31 - James Bay
50 - Dockyard Westshore
51 - Dockyard UVic
61 - Sooke/Downtown
71 - Sidney/Downtown
72 - Swartz Bay/Downtown via Fifth
73 - Swartz Bay/Downtown via West Sidney
75 - Saanichton/Royal Oak/Downtown

Page 42 volume 4

6) The report claims that the LRT will return a value of $571,000,000 to vehicle drivers - that is more than a third of the assumed benefit of the LRT.   The report assumes that the LRT will reduce congestion enough to save people time worth that much time.   This assumptions falls apart because of the assumed level of transit capacity at the moment and the actual capacity at the moment.  It is also based on an immediate 30% increase in new transit users because of the LRT.   They used a very small sample and ignored ones in which transit use when down to get to the 30% number.

When we look at at the actual numbers of current users and the total number of people that would on transit and no longer in their car, the actual number of new transit users from the Westshore would be in the range of 200 to 800 people.   That reduces the demand on the TCH by 118 to 470 vehicles, or 1.3 to 5.2 cars per minute during rush hour.   This is not enough to make any serious impact on road congestion.  Given the reduction in lanes on Douglas, there will actually be an increase in congestion.

Page 57 volume 4

Enough for today on this thing.  They should not have released these reports because till now I could only assume of the issues, now I can be certain they do not understand or know the transit system they were looking at.

Dean Murdock's Press Release about his re-election campaign

As I get any press releases from candidates, I will be posting them here.

MEDIA RELEASE
For Immediate ReleaseSeptember 1, 2011
Saanich’s Murdock seeking re-election
Victoria – The municipal election race is heating up in Saanich. Councillor Dean Murdock announced today that he will seek re-election to Saanich Council this fall.
“It’s been an incredible privilege to represent Saanich residents for the last three years,” Murdock says. “I’ve worked hard to bring forward solutions that enhance our transportation options, provide affordable housing, protect our climate, green space, and farmland, and promote sustainable growth. But there’s still work to do.”
Murdock is also running for a spot on the CRD Board. “A lot of the issues affecting Saanich, particularly traffic, are regional issues,” he says. “Those challenges require regional solutions. I will be a strong voice at the CRD Board to advocate for regional solutions that help Saanich residents.”
The first-term Councillor says he is inspired by Saanich residents who believe in the changes Council has made, but want to see more to improve their community.
“I’ve knocked on over a thousand doors this spring and summer,” he says. “People love this community, but they’re frustrated by traffic and a lack of transportation options. They want more affordable housing so young families can settle in their neighbourhoods. And they want us to protect our green spaces and farmland.”
Murdock chairs Saanich’s Healthy Saanich Committee and is the former chair of the Sierra Club Victoria. He serves on the CRD Water Supply Commission and Provincial Capital Commission.
Murdock works for the BC Ministry of Health as a Manager of Public Health Planning. He and his wife are long-time Saanich residents. They have a two-year-old son and two dogs – a beagle and golden retriever.
In the coming weeks, Murdock will release his full campaign platform, including transportation, affordable housing, food security, and environmental leadership as priority initiatives.
Municipal elections are November 19.-30-
Media Contact:Dean Murdock -- Phone: 250.889.0242; Email: dean.murdock@telus.net

Longest Servicing City of Victoria Councilors

I was looking though some old elections in the City and wondered who were the longest serving Victoria City councilor/aldermen - time as mayor not counted.   Here is the list of all of them that have served 15 or more years:

  • Geoff Young 23 years - 1984-99, 2006 to current
  • Pam Madoff 18 years - 1994-current
  • Robert Dewar 17 years - 1920-37
  • J.A. Worthington 17 years - 1928-45
  • Helen Hughes 16 years - 1991-2006
  • William Fullerton 15 years - 1905-11, 1913-17, 1919-21

Interestingly the two longest serving councilors in the 149 year history of the City of Victoria are currently on the council.  Three of the longest serving councilors were all on the same council from 1994 to 1999.

Longest Serving Mayors:

  • Alan Lowe 9 years - 1999 to 2008 (also 6 years on council)
  • Andrew McGavin 8 years - 1936-44 (4 years on council)
  • Peter Pollen 8 years - 1971-1975, 1981-85 (2 years on council)
  • George Percy 7 years - 1944-51 (3 years on council)


I am honestly surprised to not see any longer tenures as mayor.   Even if their council time is added to their tenure as mayor, only one of them reaches 15 years.   Meanwhile in Saanich Frank Leonard has been mayor for 15 years now.